Tag Archives: Craft beer

Why You Should Care About That Grain Belt Sign

Grain Belt Sign
Image from Schell’s Twitter of the Grain Belt Sign

Grain Belt Lock and Dam

You’ve probably already heard that Schell’s has bought the iconic Grain Belt Beer sign that overlooks the Mississippi river in Minneapolis. They plan to restore and re-light the sign by 2017. And if you’ve heard that, then you’ve almost definitely heard that Schell’s is planning to brew a new beer to celebrate this acquisition – a copper lager by the name of Lock & Dam Lager under the Grain Belt brand. The promise of a new lager from a brewery putting out some of the best lagers in the state is definitely exciting news. Remember, Schell’s has taken home GABF medals for Firebrick and Oktoberfest. Even Grain Belt won silver in 2014 and gold in 1994. Despite all this, you might be wondering why we should be so excited about them planning to buy and restore an old beer sign. I mean, Grain Belt isn’t on most craft beer lovers top ten lists. And it is after all, just a rusty old sign.

A Rich History

Grain Belt Brewery
The Historic Minnesota Brewing Company Brewery

Grain Belt isn’t just another pale lager that just happens to be brewed in Minnesota. Much like the malted barley used to produce beer, Grain Belt is steeped in the history of Minnesota. To get to the origins of Grain Belt, we must look back to July of 1890, when four breweries joined together to create the Minneapolis Brewing and Malting Company. This name was later shortened to The Minneapolis Brewing Company. The new brewery this conglomerate constructed would be one of the largest producers of beer of its time. It eventually producing half a million barrels of beer every year. For reference, there is not a single brewery in Minnesota today producing that much – Schell’s comes closest at 131,000 barrels per year. This brewery still stands in Minneapolis to this day, and its unique style stands out. When it was built four different architectural styles were used to honor the four original breweries. It’s this that gives the brewery it’s “mismatched” style.

And the most popular beer of Minneapolis Brewing Company? The Golden Grain Belt Old Lager, whose name honored this part of the country. Minneapolis Brewing Company produced more beer than almost any other brewery in the state, bested only by the Theodore Hamm Brewing Company. Grain Belt was being sold as far away as Michigan, Illinois, and Nebraska. In today’s time of interstate trucks and international distribution this may not seem impressive, but for the time it was a rare achievement.

After prohibition ended Grain Belt returned strong and became one of the most popular beers in the country. But by the 1950s sales had faltered and in 1975 the brand was bought and quickly sold to the G. Heileman Brewing Company in La Crosse, Wisconsin. This would take Grain Belt out of Minnesota, at least temporarily. This would be the last time the Grain Belt Beer sign lit up the Mississippi River.

A Bright Future for Grain Belt

grainbeltnewlabel
Schell’s Grain Belt

In 2001 Schell’s purchased the brand, returning it to Minnesota and restoring its popularity. It has again become one of the most popular brands of the Midwest, and in 2010 released a new beer, Nordeast, in honor of Northeast Minneapolis. By restoring that old sign Schell’s is restoring an integral part of craft beer – and Minnesota – history.

Every brewery in Minnesota today owes a nod to the Minneapolis Brewing Company and Grain Belt, who were pioneers in Minnesota beer. And yes, in the end, we are just talking about a sign. Nonetheless, I look forward to seeing its light reflecting on the Mississippi again, a symbol of not just Minnesota’s rich history, but the exploding beer culture in our state.

Head to Schell’s website or Twitter for more updates.

We Live in an Age of Superlatives

The world wants a hero. We thrive on hope and dependence on hSupermaneroes. We live in the age of the superlative. Basketball is not the same without Michael Jordan. Hockey without Gretzky, Golf without Tiger. We live in an age where second best is the first worst and the supporting cast may as well be a part of the set. Jordan is not a champion without Pippen and Rodman. And a beer is not a great beer without over 4000 years of development, research and history all leading up to the scene that exists today.

Why do I bring this up? I heard the most heartbreaking analysis of a beer recently and I must address this. It’s all too common in a society with a growing interest in craft beer. The quote was “I don’t like that beer. It’s too balanced.” The idea that moderation can be superlative is beyond my comprehension. Moreover, the notion that a beer cannot have balance in order to be well-crafted makes me cry a little on the inside. What’s wrong with balance? I thought that was the goal!

Let me say this: I like IPA’s. I love a good hop-forward juicy Midwest-style IPA with a big citrus presence and pleasant, if not slightly abrasive IBU’s backed up with a good malt brackround. It pains me, however, to see that the metric for measuring bitterness has become a foot race for the highest IBU’s in a beer. It’s not just the IPA’s either. It’s sours, dark beers and high-alcohol beers changing their focus to match the search for the biggest beer in order to follow the trend rather than focusing on a well-made product. That’s not art. That’s not craft.

So why does this superlative exist in beer and not in wine? Because these styles are new. Post-prohibition United States was focused on production and modernization, which allowed for mega breweries to step in and redefine beer in America for almost a century now. Our food stayed the same and our wine stayed the same, but beer went almost exclusively to the American Light Lager style, usually made with adjunct grains. The modern cultural revolution is both re-creating classic American and Euro styles, whilst simultaneously creating new ones like the White IPA and Cascadian Dark Ale. Our palates are now freed to explore the styles which were once very prevalent across the country, but new to our generations, and like kids in a candy store, we are excited to try them all. But while exploring bigger and more extreme beers, we must not forget moderation.  There is a reason you don’t walk into a restaurant and ask a 5-star chef for their saltiest of dishes.

Why wait for Superman when we can all lend a helping WIN_20140812_151006hand? Why wait for the next Jordan to emerge from the masses when there are plenty of great players like the 2004 Pistons. And why search for the highest IBU’s when Pilsners and Amber Lagers have been pleasing the masses for generations of great brewing tradition.  By all means, explore and have fun. Find the superlative beers and expand your palate, but please don’t forget how we’ve arrived at these new creations. Sir Isaac Newton once said, “If I have seen farther, it is only because I stood on the shoulders of giants.” New Breweries with big new flavors only exist because of the groundwork that older breweries have set up with classic styles and growing a beer culture to begin with. So leave competition out of it. Have a little taste of history and enjoy a nicely-balanced session beer. Cheers!

follow me on twitter @tcbeerdude

Who’s Got the Best Oktoberfest?

In this crazy world of craft beer and hundreds of styles ranging from Pilsners to Russian imperials, I have people ask me all the time, “What’s your favorite beer?” I don’t have an answer to that. I can, however, answer with my favorite style of beer and that’s the Oktoberfest. All year long, I wait in anxious anticipation for fall because that means the Marzens are coming back. I enjoy a good fresh hop and a good pumpkin beer, but give me a good festbier any time. This year, I decided to figure out who’s got the best fest.Tasting Panel at Rock Bottom

Myself, along with a panel of craft beer fans all with great palates made our way through 30 Oktoberfest-style beers over a 3-week period to get to the bottom of it.

Our Panel

Sean Cooke – Certified Cicerone®
Gill – Cicerone Program Certified Beer Server
Nate Walters – Cicerone Program Certified Beer Server
Caleb Gustafson
Jen G

History

Oktoberfest and its relation to beer is really just a coincidence. The history of the style came from regulations set forth in Germany in the year 1516 which did not allow brewers to make beer during the summer months when they were more prone to infection and mishandling. This was also the law that forced the use of hops for bittering and preserving the beer. March was the latest in the brewing season, so brewers made sure to have their supply full as the opportunity came to a close. These March (Marzen) beers were lagers that would be ready to drink at the end of summer. In October 1810, Crown Prince Ludwig of Bavaria celebrated his wedding by throwing a party for the town centered around a horse race and held festivals every year after to celebrate his matrimony. The townsfolk also had barrels full of Marzen beer which they needed to drink up because the brewing season opened back up in the fall, so they brought all their remaining beer to these festivals to have the people help empty their supply. Thus, Oktoberfest was born. With the anniversary of the reunification of Germany happening in early October, the dates shift yearly to help the festival coincide as closely as possible with that date as well. Today there are 6 breweries that are officially allowed to use the term “Oktoberfest” in Munich.  All other brewers use the title “Fest Bier” to denote the difference. In the US, there is no such law, so we use Oktoberfest for all our Marzens.

Marzen Styles

There is a huge difference between the German Oktoberfest producers and the American ones. Until scientists linked hard water to brewing techniques and figured out ways to adapt the pH in local water, dear old Munchen was not very good at making pale beers. Traditionally Munich beers are darker and maltier, so the traditional Oktoberfest as it was historically is an Amber-brown lager much like we know in the United States today. In the late 20th century, Munich brewers began to make a paler, crisper beer, possibly as a result of the heat at the festival being too much to drink a heavier, sugary beer. In America, our beers remain darker. We have covered a number of beers of each of these styles and will judge them side-by-side without paying any sort of bias to one style or another.

Who’s Got the Best Oktoberfest?

Before I get into the beer themselves, I want to thank everyone for reading this and encourage you all to continue supporting our craft breweries. I also need to thank Elevated Beer Wine and Spirits, Four Firkins and Ale Jail who all provided most of the beers for this sampling.

We have evaluated these beers based on their craftsmanship, balance, complexity and desire to order another. Points are deducted, however for excessive deviation from the Marzen style. Each of our scores has been averaged together to create one score for each brewery overall.Altenmunster

Shameless plug — you should follow me on twitter: @tcbeerdude

Okay, let’s find out who’s got the best beers!

Altenmunster Score: 5.3

I have to say that I was very excited to crack this bottle. It comes in a gigantic resealable bottle that now sits proudly in my bottle collection. The beer was good, but that’s about all. This is on the lighter end of the German-style Marzen beers. Lots of grassy malt flavors fill the aroma and body of this beer. Flavors of lightly-toasted honey and biscuit build toward the back end and finishes with an herbal hoppiness and a hint of toasted bread. This would be a good beer to have quite a few of at the Munich Oktoberfest, but ultimately leaves us wanting a bit more complexity.

Harriet Score: 7.3

The Longfellow neighborhood brewery historically has put out a very good Oktoberfest and this year is no different. Harriet’s ended up being one of the favorites. This is much more in the American-style of Marzen that builds into a richer body than the Altenmunster. The nose gives you an insight into the old-world hops with a spicy, light herbal nose with hints of ripe stone fruit. Hops present themselves right at the beginning with a pleasant spice, while a water-cracker-like malt lays down a base sweetness. The grain-bill then builds complexity by addind flavors of raisin bread and finishes with a touch of caramel that lingers and reminds you that you want another.Sam Adams

Sam Adams Score: 7.8

Sam Adams is one of the beers that helps define the American/Original Oktoberfest-style beer. Not surprisingly, the Boston brewery had a very strong showing this year as well. The nose is a little light, but gives you hints of the medium-toasted malt sweetness that is soon to come. The flavor begins at bitter and herbal hops, much like Harriet’s lager. A light graham cracker malt flavor quickly builds to brown sugar and    bread-crust flavors and finishes with a hint of caramel before clearing out nicely. The minty, herbal hops maintain their presence throughout the experience to provide a nice balance. Overall, a very good beer.

Weiheistephaner Score: 8.5

Weiheistephaner is the world’s oldest continually-operated brewery, so these guys know what they’re doing. Their product definitely reflects that and exemplifies true craftsmanship and understanding of brewing techniques. We were initially pretty surprised at the color – a very light gold reminiscent of a pilsner beer, but don’t let that fool you. The nose suggests a pilsner-style beer as well with aromas of fresh-cut grass and sweet young honey. Upon first sip, however, you realize that there is a great deal of malt complexity hiding beneath the surface. The first taste is of a floury undercooked biscuit and takes off from there giving you the flavors of a well-toasted biscuit with honey and a little bit of butter and then finishes with toasted bread crust. Truly a remarkable beer. You must have one.0924142235

Paulaner Score: N/A

I was a little disappointed this year with tasting the Paulaner, but not because of the brewery. We tried two different Paulaner bottles from two different batches and found that the beers were slightly oxidized. This is more a problem with the packaging and handling as it comes across the ocean and deals with temperature changes and should not reflect poor craftsmanship. Unfortunately, we did not track this down on tap to try it as a panel, but I have had it on tap this year and it is perfectly fine.  We did not score the beer because we thought it would be unfair, but here are the tasting notes:
Rich honey and hints of light fruit with an overtone of fresh cut green wood. Rich honey, brown sugar. May be oxidized. Slightly papery and drying.  Give this another tasting.

Lake Superior Score: 7.3

I didn’t know Lake Superior was going to make an Oktoberfest, so it was good to see them on the shelf and get them into the running. The Duluth brewery also had a very decent showing. The nose is of fresh cane sugar with hints of clove, cinnamon and white chocolate. Upon first sip, you’ll notice a hop-forward flavor as your palate waits for the grains to make it to the table. The malt flavor is of toasted graham cracker and brown sugar, but the hops compete for your attention. The finish is of a light hoppy green spice. Overall a really good beer with a nice malt complexity, but the hops slightly detract from giving this a higher score

Hofbrau Score: 7.0

Ahh, Hofbrau. The only green bottle in the bunch. Hofbrau-Munchen is one of the 6 official brewers for the Bavarian Oktoberfest style, so this is 100% authentic German-style Oktoberfest beer.  That being said, the word pilsner came up quite a bit in our conversation and it’s difficult to associate with being a fall beer. The aroma is of light grass and honey with hints of black currant and wet hay. The first taste is of a doughy, light biscuit complimented by a rich, ripe honey sweetness. Noble hops add an herbal finish. Overall a good beer, but I don’t know that I could look forward to this all year compared to other lagers.

Left Hand Score: 5.5

Left hand provided us with a good beer this year, but the flavor started to break from style boundaries and ended up losing points overall. The aroma is fruit forward as if to suggest a Belgian yeast temperature during fermentation. There’s a lot of banana on the nose with hints of bubble gum. These esters translate directly onto the palate after first taste and are met by a malt sweetness reminiscent of raisin, fresh bread, and brown sugar. The darker fruits stay on your palate after the malt has subsided, which really pushes boundaries even for an American-style lager. If I were to blind-taste this Marzen, I would probably pick it out as a Biere de Garde. It’s a very enjoyable beer, but not what we’re looking for.

Ayinger Score: 8.0

These are the droids you’re looking for! The Ayinger lager gives us a perfect nose of rich bread and honey with hints of a golden raisin sweetness. The flavor is also that of a rich amber-gold honey with low levels of diacetyl that lend themselves nicely to the malt complexity. The grains develop flavors of graham cracker and brown sugar while the hops provide just enough bitterness to balance this beer throughout. Overall this was one of the favorites.0924142237

Abita Score: 7.5

While in New Orleans, I quickly realized that Abita Amber is the Summit EPA of New Orleans. I had many an Amber while eating fresh seafood and listening to live jazz music while in the Big Easy and I looked forward to seeing if their Oktoberfest lager measured up to their flagship. I was not disappointed. The nose brought forth whiffs of light dough and bitter orange peel with hints of bread crust. The base malt was one of fresh bread and well-cooked bread crust reminiscent of a good Bavarian pretzel. The subtle malt complexity leaves you wanting a little more of the complimentary flavors. This is a very well-balanced beer, but perhaps a bit too subtle in the end. Overall, a really good beer.

Spaten Score: 4.0

Getting to the Spaten, we start to come across the first of the beers that we did not like. This Munich brewery has a great reputation and I definitely expected better. The aroma was of fresh honey, green vegetables and a little bit of chalky limestone. The flavor was also a little green. The malt character brought forth roasted honey and biscuit, but not a lot of it. While drinkable, this was looked down upon overall and called “The Budweiser of Oktoberfest.”

Central Waters Score: 3.8

Central Waters is known for being experts at malt-forward beers, but we were let down by this example. The aroma is one closer to a Euro Oktoberfest than an American one with light grassy pilsner malt notes. The body is pretty light overall with sweetness of graham cracker and brown sugar. The mouthfeel is watery and sugary with a few green flavors yet in the brew. This reminds me a lot of tasting wort before it’s fully fermented and left us wondering if this beer needed just a bit more time to ferment before bottling.

Summit Score: 7.8

Summit’s Oktoberfest this year was solid. The lager had a biscuit and toasty aroma with hints of light fruit and herbs. The flavor begins with a grassy light malt balanced nicely by herbal hops and quickly develops flavors of graham cracker and brown sugar. The beer clears up nicely with no lingering hops and a touch of caramel. I should note that there is a nice raisin-like fruitiness throughout that compliments the beer nicely. This was one of my personal favorites and had a good response from the panel.

Hacker-Pschorr Original Score: 7.30924142232

Hacker-Pschorr made two beers this year – a darker malted American/Original style called Original and a modern-Euro style called Authentic. The original was damn good. The aroma is one of a good malt sweetness with hints of white grapes. The flavor itself is one of fresh bread, amber honey and brown sugar. The white grape from the nose carries through into the flavor as well, but is fairly subtle and compliments the malt well. This is a bit lighter than the American/Original styles and has a great flavor, but we felt as if it needed a bit more complexity to receive a higher score. Great beer overall, though.

Hacker-Pschorr Authentic Score:6.0

The Hacker-Pschorr Authentic did not have as good a reception as the original. The aroma is one of young honey and fresh cut grass, which translates into a pilsner malt flavor. A slightly minty hop compliments the light body. This is a good representation of the German-style lager, but we felt that it fell a little flat overall and couldn’t give it a higher score.

Shiner Score 7.0

Shiner’s Oktoberfest happily snuck into the middle of the pack and is a pretty good lager. The aroma is of a deep, rich honey and wild grasses. A spicy, herbal hop presence balances the toasty malt at the forefront of the tasting, but then takes a back seat as more complex sweetness comes from notes of brown sugar and graham cracker. The malt complexity is certainly there, but is a touch light overall. My notes say “very drinkable!”

Epic Fest Devious Score: N/A

If you ever want to hear craft beer enthusiasts in a friendly, but heated argument about style guidelines while trying to come up with the best sports analogy, you should come spend some time with Gill and me. While this beer was one of Gill’s favorites, we decided to take this out of the running because it did not fit the style and would be unfair to compare Marzens to oranges. The Epic Fest Devious is a Marzen lager that breaks free of the expectations of the style. This is apparent as soon as you see the haze in your glass. The aroma and flavor are of cherry, black cherry, chocolate and banana. The body is fairly rich and hops provide a nice balance, but this is a fruit-forward beer, not malt-forward and tastes more like a product of Belgian-style brewing than German. Certainly try it, but don’t expect to be transported to Bavaria

Prost Score 4.3

The Prost Oktoberfest was good…but weird. The aromas on the nose were of a toasted bread crust. The body was relatively light for an American style with malty sweetness reminiscent of biscuit, brown sugar and caramel. The problem was that there is a big minty, menthol taste that lingered for quite a while after the finish. While I enjoyed the beer, the cooling menthol taste and sensation was a bit hard to overlook and I didn’t finish the beer.

Great Lakes Score 6.7

Great Lakes was the first Oktoberfest I had this season over at Butcher and the Boar. The aroma is almost non-existent with hints of black currant bud. The hops take center stage upon first sip while presenting bright, herbal flavors and then quickly clearing out to make way for the grains. The malt is decently complex with notes of doughy, fresh bread, biscuit, and toast. This is overall well balanced, but the hops could have stayed around a little longer to balance the sweetness.

Brooklyn Score 2.3

The Brooklyn Marzen left a lot to be desired. The aroma brought forth a slew of fruit such as lemon, white grape and red apple. The flavor was more of a flash in the pan, providing notes of dry grass and caramel before disappearing. The first taste is big, but leaves no complexity and a musty cider aftertaste. I didn’t finish my 3oz sample.

Goose Island Score 3.3

Goose Island makes some good beers. That being said, this isn’t one of them. An array of fruity yeast esters take over the beer including banana, bubble gum, red grape, plum, raisin, dry peach, and fig. There is a bit of toffee sweetness, but barely any malt presence to balance the fruit salad. Not an Oktoberfest and not a balanced beer.

Victory Score 8.7

Alas, a break from the mold. There are just a few beers that stand out as being truly well crafted. Victory’s Oktoberfest certainly fits the bill. The aroma reminds us of a freshly baked honey bread with a nicely-toasted crust as it comes out of your oven. The Malt provides flavors of graham cracker, dark toasted biscuits and a touch of caramelized apple. There is a decent base layer of hops to balance the barley. This was certainly one of the fan favorites this year

Leinenkeugel’s Big Eddy Uber-Oktoberfest Score: N/A

The Big Eddy was disappointing. The flavor lied somewhere in no-man’s-land between a Belgian Tripel and a Belgian Dubbel. The flavor was not great and did not fit the bill for a lager, much less a Marzen. Not really worth investigating.

Two Brothers Atom Smasher Score 8.0

The Two Brothers’ Atom Smasher was also a surprise this year. This lager was a great example of a nicely-balanced brew. It is also barrel-aged, but we did not feel as if that affected the flavor enough to break style guidelines or made an uneven playing field for the others. Rich Amber-Gold honey and fresh-cut grass greet you in the aroma. The rich malt body starts with flavors of toasted biscuits and grow to bread crust and brown sugar sweetness. Oaky vanillin flavor peeks through at the end, which definitely plays well with brown sugar notes. You should pick one of these up.

Lakefront Score: 5.7

The Lakefront Marzen fell much more on the side of the German Oktoberfest style than the American/Original style. The aroma brought forth images of fresh fall grass clippings from a light base malt. The grassy sweetness continues in the flavor and is complemented with a sweet graham cracker note. Hops balance this beer throughout and the finish is expectedly clean.

MKE Hoptoberfest Score N/A

We picked up the MKE Hoptoberfest knowing full well that it would not meet style guidelines. The beer provides little aroma, despite big flavor. The taste is that of light biscuit and doughy malt notes supplemented with both German and American hop characteristics. It’s a decent beer, but since it’s hop-forward, we can’t judge apples and oranges in the same mix.

Schell’s Score 5.0

I’m a big fan or Schell’s Firebrick Amber and was really looking forward to their submission to the Oktoberfest selection, but ended up a little disappointed by the historic New Ulm brewery. The nose is that of light, young apple and the flavor brings forth bready, biscuit and caramel sweetness but the flavor is too light and tastes watered-down. There is a good balance almost no complexity to it at all. I think a simple modification to the Firebrick recipe would have made for a much better showing.0924142231b

612 Brew Score: 7.3

Firstly, I have to thank Robert from 612 Brew for making last-minute accommodations for me to come pick up this beer and include it in our tasting. It’s rare for a new brewery to get into lagers so quickly, much less ones of this quality. We were really impressed by the 612 Oktoberfest. This is one that we would consider a hybrid between American and German style marzens with a lighter body, but still darker malt notes than modern German producers. The aroma provides a rich nuttiness and notes of baked bread with some stone fruit in the mix. The rich bread and toast translates into the flavor as well and are complimented with notes of caramel and brown sugar. The noble hops subside at the end and leave room for a lingering sweetness that reels you back in for another taste.

Rock Bottom Score 6.0

Beer discussions become interesting when there is one person whose opinions stand out as being different from the rest. Upon further investigation into this obvious Minority Report analogy, we discovered that my beer was very different than the other three that were poured just a few minutes before. While theirs were malty, full bodied lagers, mine remained watery and undesirable. They were poured off the same taps, so we’re guessing I got one near the end of the keg.  That being said, a good beer should be consistent throughout and I cannot overlook this error. The bad beer is reflected in my score and has been averaged with theirs based on the correct beer flavor. The part that stuck out about this beer the most was the crisp finish. That was definitely a highlight. The aroma was non-existent, and flavor was well-rounded and malt balanced. There was definitely a good bready sweetness as a base and a hint of caraway that certainly peaked our interest. Though it was a good beer, there really wasn’t a great complexity to it. Again, the highlight was certainly on proper lagering techniques that brought a good, crisp finish, but a happy ending isn’t much without an interesting story (Twilight!). Go have one of these beers, but be ready to send it back if you think it’s too watery.

Freehouse Score 8.3

Blue Plate’s Brew Pub is not only a good tongue twister, it’s a damn good brewery. The Freehouse Oktoberfest is exactly what to look for as far as an archetypal American-style Marzen. The aroma was full with notes of caramel and nutty, toasty bread. The flavor had a rich complexity with malty flavors of toffee, peanuts, and caramel. There is a nice hop balance, but definitely not too strong. The lager had a pleasant, full mouthfeel and lingering graham cracker and brown sugar sweetness at the finish. The dark sweetness also had complementary notes of a ripe white peach and pear fruit esters. Definitely one of the best.

Final Standings

BREWERY SCORE PLACE
Victory 8.7 1
Weihenstephaner 8.5 2
Freehouse 8.3 3
Ayinger 8.0 4 (tie)
 Two Brothers Atom Smasher 8.0 4 (tie)
Sam Adams 7.8 6 (tie)
Summit 7.8 6 (tie)
Abita 7.5 8
Harriet 7.3 9 (tie)
Lake Superior 7.3 9 (tie)
Hacker-Pschorr Original 7.3 9 (tie)
612 Brew 7.3 9 (tie)
Hofbrau 7.0 13 (tie)
Shiner 7.0  13 (tie)
Great Lakes 6.7 15
Hacker-Pschorr Authentic 6.0 16 (tie)
Rock Bottom 6.0  16 (tie)
Lakefront 5.7 18
Left Hand 5.5 19
Altenmunster 5.3 20
Schell’s 5.0 21
Prost 4.3 22
Spaten 4.0 23
Central Waters 3.8 24
Goose Island 3.3 25
Brooklyn 2.3 26

The Art of Judging Beer

I was leaving my house, notebook in hand, to go to the Minnesota State Fair to judge beer when I said to my friend and temporary roommate, “Well, I’m off to do what I do best: be judgmental.”

“No,” he responded, “you just have a gift for discernment.” What a good friend.

State Fair Beer areaI signed up for beer discernment at the Minnesota State Fair for the very first time because more experienced brewers had told me that it is a valuable experience for developing beer tasting skills. It was pretty simple, one Google search, several pages of questions, and I was in.

The judging is organized by the Primary Fermenters, a homebrew club out of the Twin Cities that has been in operation since 2008. Many of their members are ranked through the Beer Judging Certification Program (BJCP), but they provide both highly BJCP-qualified as well as novice beer judges for many competitions around Minnesota. People who have been homebrewing since before it was cool, Grand Master BJCP judges, and beer aficionados gather to thoughtfully criticize, praise, and appreciate the beers submitted to the Minnesota State Fair. And each year there are novices like me that somehow survive the process.

This year, over 750 beer submissions were made, narrowed to about 740 based on rules such as Minnesota residency.

PF glass

I signed up for two sessions on Saturday, but my first encounter with my fellow judges took place at Pour Decisions on Friday. Primary Fermenters hosted a little party for us there with free barbecue and homebrew. I ran into two friends who had just come from their first time judging. They had a positive experience, but I was getting nervous just from their advice.

“You will get paired with a master judge,” and “make sure you touch on each point,” said one friend. “Remember, a score in the 30’s out of 50 is a good score.” Then came, “don’t forget to talk about every portion in your summary.” My head was spinning. I drank another beer.

WP_20130817_021Driving a car through the State Fair feels a bit surreal, as does being there when it’s quiet and the bathrooms are clean. Approaching the Horticulture building, I tried to forget about my nerves and focus on learning about judging and having fun. The very mixed crowd was mingling in anticipation but the vibe was pretty mellow.

I found my spot and looked over the provided mechanical pencils as though it was the morning of the ACT. The coffee and donut were helping me to relax. I found my name: my assignment was category 13 – Stouts, and my partner was Christopher Smith.

Judging Materials

As the six of us gradually filled our table, I introduced myself and confessed that it was my first time judging. There were three of us who were non-BJCP plus three highly qualified, acclaimed judges. Our steward (like a very helpful host and facilitator) Tim was also fun and helpful. I considered myself lucky to be learning from all of them.

Table of judges

Judging station

My partner Chris, a Master BJCP, has been judging beer since 2005. To my left was Steve Platz, the man who has judged more beer than anyone else in the entire state, a Grand Master BJCP. His partner Tony Ebertz was on the newer side like me, judging for the third time.

They told me how the process works: First you assess the beer for what it is. You make specific statements about what is or isn’t present. You speak to the general experience of the brew. Finally you score it, and here is where you take into account the style and determine whether it is or isn’t what the brewer intended or the guideline states it should be.

I was following along just fine, and grateful to see the table was littered with BJCP style guidelines as most of my knowledge of stouts was feeling hard to retrieve at that moment.

The scoresheets include a judge’s email and full name; competitors are free to contact judges after they receive their scores.

Chris told me about assessing the bottle, pouring (into the center of the cup with no tipping!) and walked me through the categories. aroma, appearance, flavor, mouthfeel, and overall impression.

It was time to do this thing.

WP_20130817_016I began appraising and scoring our first beer. While Chris expertly jotted down notes and appraisals, I was just focused on honing a sensitive palate and recalling vocabulary. He had completed nearly every section and I was in no way keeping up. He was very patient, though, and we discussed our findings at the end. The beer was better than mediocre and we had both given similar scores in the low 30s. Some of our notes and comments were similar, too. My confidence began to set in and I even said out loud at one point, “so I’m NOT crazy!” I was quite proud that our scores remained similar throughout the round.

Bottles Judging

Several great beers came across our table. We tried dry stouts, sweet stouts, oatmeal stouts, foreign extra stouts, and Russian Imperial stouts. Chris and I sent one sweet stout and one foreign extra on to the next round to be considered for best in show by the three experts at my table.

One of the most intriguing parts of the day was listening to the Masters and Grand Master debate about the merits of each of the beers presented at the finals table. Lunch was provided, so I grabbed a bagel and sat next to them. At one point, Steve said, “it’s oaky like oak sawdust, not like oak barrels.”

WP_20130817_025

Facetiously, I said “oh, right.” He went on to explain that oak barrels are charred, creating a different taste.

It was this kind of knowledge sharing that was the best part about my day of judging.

My second session was spent on porters – brown porters, robust porters, and Baltic porters. I felt slightly more confident, but when my partner didn’t show I started to panic. I was finally paired with someone else. What if I couldn’t perform in this category the way that I just had?

Judging cheers

To my relief, while it started a bit rocky with slightly more disparate scores, my partner Trevor and I hit our stride and even tasted one excellent robust porter that we both agreed we would pay for.

I thanked everyone several times, and was genuinely humbled and grateful for the experience from start to finish. I felt enlightened, challenged, and supported simultaneously and I would definitely do it again.

If this experience sounds interesting and fun to you, I encourage you to try it. There is no better way to enhance your palate and sharpen your skills than to drink with people more talented than you.

For me, this was the right time to try this, as I have been critically drinking beer for about a year. I felt that I had some of the basic vocabulary and a gift of discernment, as some have called it.

Special thanks to Primary Fermenters, Christopher Smith, Steve Platz, and Tony Ebertz, Tim and Trevor. Thanks to MN Beer Activists for encouraging this experience.