All posts by Justin Rihn

Justin is an avid beer and brewing historian who loves a good story, especially over a pint. Formerly the tour guide at Lift Bridge Brewing Company before making the long trek down to Florida he now spends his spare time exploring a whole new beer scene. Follow him on twitter @historybrewing or like his page at facebook.com/somehistorybrewing for cool beer history and news.

All Tied up in Blue (Laws)

In 2011, it had been over 90 years since anyone could buy a pint directly from a Minnesota brewery due to Minnesota’s new taproom law this was about to change.  When discussing Minnesota’s taproom law, most people assume the law just overturned outdated blue laws remnant from the Prohibition Era.  However, the legislation dealing with the taproom law was not technically a blue law since it was not designed to restrict access to alcohol on certain days but to reduce corruption in alcohol distribution.  These laws instituted various versions, depending on the state, of what would be called the three tier system.  The three tier system had two distinct purposes; one was to eliminate organized crime from the alcohol industry and the other was to end the pre-prohibition system of tied houses.

One may ask, what is a tied house and where did the idea come from?  The tied house system originated in Great Britain’s brewing industry as a form of vertical integration where the pub was owned by the brewery.  This system was abolished recently (in the 1990s) in the UK as to foster competition.  The problem for British beer lovers (like the Campaign for Real Ale (CAMRA)) was that the pubs did not become independently owned but entered a different tied house system.  Instead of the brewery controlling the pub, the pubs were purchased and controlled by giant “pubcos” (think Applebees.)  CAMRA claims that the abolishment of the old tied house system not only led to the closure of local pubs but lowered the quality of the available ales.

What does this have to do with beer on the American side of the Atlantic?  The United States had its own short lived experience with the tied house system.  From the 1840s through the end of the nineteenth century the United States experienced its first beer renaissance with a large influx in immigration of German, Czech, and Scandinavian people.  They brought with them beer culture and a lighter style of beer called lager.  Many of these recent immigrants enjoyed a culture of social beer drinking.  German immigrants in particular enjoyed socializing in large beer halls or gardens with their entire families.  The most common day for this activity was Sunday when most working class people enjoyed a day off.  Many initial Blue laws were designed to restrict the influence of immigrant culture by outlawing alcohol sales on Sundays.  Many recent immigrants saw this not only as an attack on their culture but as a design to curb their political will by preventing them from publicly gathering.    This coincided with the birth of the “dry” or Temperance Movement.

The temperance movement would first attempt to enact total prohibition at the state level with acts like the Maine Law of 1851.  These ideas did not find much traction in the large German immigrant populations of Milwaukee and Chicago and would eventually fail.  In Chicago, these forces would come to physical blows in the “Lager Beer Riots” when the Illinois Sunday Closure Law was enforced by Chicago’s new mayor Levi Boone in 1955.  Ultimately, 31 saloon owners refused to be closed on Sunday and were promptly arrested.  The civil unrest would eventually lead to these laws being reversed.  Their failures fresh in their minds, temperance advocates devised a new strategy.

Their new strategy was to raise the licensing fee to levels that saloon owners could not afford.  The new fees ranged from as low as $50 to over $500 in some areas.  In order to save the retail establishments marketing their products, the breweries would step in with low interest loans or even direct ownership.  The temperance movement viewed this adjustment as an acceptable change.

Beer, primarily due to its lower alcohol content, had long been viewed as a temperance beverage.  With direct brewery involvement, it was assumed that beer would be exclusively served and the large companies would not tolerate vice, as in gambling or prostitution, in their establishments.  Early on this was the case.  For example, the Schlitz Palm Garden, built in 1896, was a 4,500 square foot Victorian inspired beer garden that served food, held orchestra concerts, displayed works of art, and feature a park for family picnics.

The growth of the brewing industry in the late 1800s created an increasingly competitive environment leading to an era known as the “Beer Wars.”  During the Beer Wars the large breweries (e.g.Schlitz, Pabst, Busch, and so on) would cut their prices in half to drive out any competition.  During this highly competitive time, many saloon keepers were also faced with increased pressure to obtain greater profits and more revenue.  Faced with the increasing pressure, some unscrupulous saloon keepers turned a blind eye to gambling, prostitution, and other forms of vice in return for kickbacks.

Interestingly prior to the 1900s the Minneapolis city attorney D. F. Simpson and the wealthy Pillsbury family launched the Minneapolis Plan of 1884.  The goal of the plan was to curb the political influence of saloons by confining them to business districts, thus eliminating the neighborhood saloon.  When compared to other major American cities in the height of the era, the Twin Cities had one of the highest concentrations of tied houses.  In 1908 only 38 of 432 saloons in Minneapolis were independently owned.  For example, the Minneapolis Brewing Company had 131 saloons.

There were benefits to this system.  First, many breweries spent lavishly on the construction of their tied houses.  For instance, today Ward 6 in St. Paul is an example of a restored Hamm’s tied house.  There are also many great examples of the most prolific tied house brewer, Schlitz, in Chicago.  Slowly but surely the social problems associated with saloons were laid at the feet of the breweries giving the temperance movement firm footing to attack them.  A marketing strategy giving free lunch to saloon patrons was often a focus for criticism as it seemed to promote daytime drinking.  The marketing strategy put many industries in the pocket of the temperance movement because they saw daytime drinking as an attack on the productivity of their workers.

The tied house system was effectively ended in the United States with the passage of the Volstead Act in 1919.  The laws repealing national prohibition resulted in the creation of state by state legislation and enforcement of a three tiered system of breweries, wholesalers, and retailers.  The three tiered system prevents breweries from having a direct connection with the retail sales of their products.  The idea was to prevent what was viewed as the monopolization of the brewing industry and increase tax revenue from breweries.  One of the main drawbacks to this system was that it raised barriers for small producers to enter the market.  The Taproom Law of 2011 only created a loophole in this system by allowing producers to sell their products on location.

Hopefully, with some background on the tied house system, we can now really appreciate how great it is to once again raise a pint at the brewery where the beer was born.  Cheers!

Time Warp….Again

Been watching HBO on Sunday nights lately? Curious about how Steve Buscemi was able to run an empire from the boardwalk in Atlantic City? Now is your chance to enjoy an in person experience with America’s most fascinating and misguided era, Prohibition. Minnesota residents should be especially aware of this lapse in judgment as it was a congressman from district 7 of our state, Andrew Volstead that authored this law. From November 9th to March 16th the Minnesota Historical Society is giving us the chance during our longest season, winter, to warm our spirits with, well, spirits. Starting today the History Center will be featuring American Spirits: The Rise and Fall of Prohibition presented by the National Constitution Center.

The exhibit kicks off tonight with the Bootlegger’s Ball when the History Center will hop in a Delorian and set the dial back 90 years to take us back to what it describes as a “swanky speakeasy”. The event will feature great ways to experience the era which ironically include legal alcohol. Appropriately Schells, the only remaining Minnesota brewery to survive Prohibition will be sampling beers, along with Summit and Lucid. Rae Katherine Eighmey (author of “Soda Shop Salvation”) and Nick Kosevich of Bittercube Bitters will be there to educate on and serve some great cocktails because the mixed drink was born in Prohibition to cover that flavor of questionably distilled booze. There will be live Dixieland jazz featuring the Southside Aces and period dance lessons so everyone can swing in style. Last but not least this is the first opportunity to wander through this exhibit with the right level of sobriety or more accurately, a lack thereof.

Andrew VolsteadOver the course of the next few months the History Center will be featuring different events highlighting some of the impacts of results of the Prohibition Era. One of these events that I will definitely been attending is the Speakeasy Saturdays reflecting the revival of local brewing and distilling. This event will feature Summit Brewing, Great Waters Brewing, and Dashfire Bitters on Saturdays from December through February. Other events during this exhibit will include a musical performance called A Toast to Prohibition: Songs of Temperance and Temptation, an ongoing series called History Lounge featuring discussions with historians, and Bootleg Valentine: Dining, dancing, and romancing in Prohibition Era Twin Cities.

All of this seems as if we have turned a blind eye to the existing remnants of Prohibition that exist in Minnesota to deny us rights to beer that other states enjoy. This is not true. Rather this exhibit should provide all of us with the opportunity to see that denying us our beer or liquor will move that potential revenue to the wrong place, not just Wisconsin. This exhibit should show us not just the rise of jazz and the cocktail, but also organized crime and the blatant destruction of an industry supporting thousands of jobs that we are beginning to recover. So, for the next few months let’s all bring out our inner historian and do the time warp again to keep Prohibition history.

American Spirits: The Rise and Fall of Prohibition
Minnesota History Center
ON VIEW NOV 9, 2013 – MARCH 16, 2014

Civilization Brewing

As we wade through the depths of human history, there has been one bright light guiding us forward.  It spread agriculture and spawned permanent civilizations.  It kept us safe and fed.  It opened our eyes and inspired our minds.  The study of it led to some of the most significant scientific and literary improvements in the human condition.  What was it that guided us forward through time?  A beverage fermented from cereal grains commonly referred to as beer!  Why is it only in the last 30 years that we’ve remembered to treat this partner the way it deserves?  Follow along and discover how our love affair with beer ushered mankind into the modern world.

Several millennia ago our ancestors were hunters and gatherers who scratched through life, surviving on what they could find.  As omnivores, humans were forced to use trial and error to determine which foods were edible.  The increase in human brain size was primarily driven by the need to remember which things were good to eat and have the ability to communicate that information to others.

Eventually, ancient man discovered that a certain seed growing on wild barley plants was good to eat if prepared properly.    In due course, people noticed that grains soften when soaked in water.  However, if left untended, these water-soaked grains would spontaneously ferment, or spoil.  Luckily enough, we are trial-and-error creatures so some adventurous soul tasted the “spoiled” water-logged grain… and beer was born. This new discovery was just the partner humans needed to propel their rise to dominance.  Since grain can be grown on throughout the world, beer spread rapidly from culture to culture, civilization to civilization. Throughout the ages, people taught each other how to prepare and eventually ferment beer.

The earliest evidence of people fermenting grains is from Jiahu, China, and dates to over 9,000 years ago.  Fermentation was tricky and misunderstood, but beer remained a staple of human existence because it was highly nutritious.   Almost every early religion had a patron “god” of beer to whom our ancestors prayed in hope of proper fermentation.  While we may question the usefulness of these prayers, ancient humans learned some practical lessons as well.  To make good beer, the water needed to be boiled – a step that (not so coincidentally) also renders water safe to drink.  Between boiling of the water and the resultant alcohol, brewed beer gave our ancestors a safe staple that allowed us to live close together in cities.  Beer allowed us to live in cities because as we all know the more people, or animals that gather together in tight spaces the dirtier those spaces become, think college dorm room.  Dirty spaces lead to polluted water supplies increasing the need to “process” this water into beer.

Every early agricultural civilization on Earth brewed beer in one form or another.  Europe, Africa, and the Americas all had cultures that – with little or no contact to ancient beer loving Middle Eastern civilizations – fermented grains independently.  As the fruit- and grape-rich areas of Greece and Rome rose to power, beer became a second-class beverage, relegated to barbarians.  However, grape-starved regions of the world did not abandon beer during this period, and many northern Europeans began to view beer as the beverage that kept them from becoming Romans. The Germans, Belgians, and Britons kept the spirit of beer alive.  Indeed, the Germans, and their beer, would eventually conquer Rome when it rotted in its own decadence.

Although the period after Roman rule is referred to as the “Dark Ages”, it was a Golden Age for beer. Beer-loving peoples ruled, and beer once again drove creativity and innovation forward.  The quest to develop our long-standing partner to its full potential began.

This was a time riddled with sickness and war.  All Europeans survived at the bequest of the Catholic Church after Rome fell. As fortune would have it, most monasteries followed a combination of Irish and German traditions – one of which required the production and distribution of beer by monks for the poor.  Monasteries in the Normandy region of France were granted hop gardens by Charlemagne around 800 C.E., and beer changed forever.  Around 500 years later, German brewers discovered that hopped beer lasted longer.  Beer could now be shipped cross-country.

With the rise of hopped beer, its production moved from monastery and home to the commercial brewery.  In order to provide enough beer to their ever-multiplying consumers, medieval brewers needed to create a consistent, quality product that could survive transportation.  This economic pressure sparked a spectacular age of innovation, as advances in beer technology spilled over into revolutionary scientific and industrial breakthroughs.

A brewer named Otto van Guericke built the first pneumatic pump in 1657 while trying to extract air from his beer kegs, an invention that eventually led to the development of the steam engine.  Another brewer, named James Joule, discovered that when pressurized, beer started to heat up – but if the pressure was released, it would cool down.  Physics students around the world study this principle today – you may know it as the first law of thermodynamics.  He also revealed why heat could be created by friction.

But the scientific progress that can be credited to beer is not limited to physics.  Louis Pasteur, while studying the diseases in fermentation of beer, discovered what yeast truly was: not magic, but a microorganism.  This discovery led to the practice of pasteurization, and inspired Pasteur to develop the “germ theory”.  Pasteur is now the father of modern medical science because he surmised that these same organisms could cause disease in humans.

As with many modern humans the consumption of a beer (or six) can kindle creativity and conversation.  During the Enlightenment Period, this inspiration was taking place in coffee houses of London, where free thinkers like John Locke, Ben Franklin, and Joseph Priestly met with their contemporaries to discuss new ideas.  These beer-fueled collaborations would lead Franklin to electricity, Priestly to the discovery of oxygen, and Locke to pen his ideas of liberty.  Many other British, French, German, and eventually American citizens gathered together around a few beers to produce the ideas that would change the face of the planet.

Only recently have Americans rediscovered that beer is not just a beverage to be mass-consumed in college or at sporting events. It is also a quality product that should be respected.  In the story just told, we can see how the production, consumption, and study of beer guided humanity towards the revolutions in industry and science that gave us the modern world.  So raise a glass and remember how beer guided us through the long journey to where we are today.   Never fail to appreciate how great a partner we have in our beer.

Why Do We Love Beer?

Very few people wake up one morning and decide they love India Pale Ales or Imperial Stouts much less young first time drinkers. Craft beer is in many cases similar to single malt scotch because most people have to make a concerted effort to truly appreciate it. Bitterness may be one of the main reasons because the taste is originally a sign of toxicity in plants. For that reason typically the palette must be trained in order to appreciate bitterness in plants like broccoli, or more importantly hops. So why do many of us put in this kind of effort to become beer lovers? For that matter why do perfectly rational normal seeming people decide to sort through piles of city, state, and federal regulations, put themselves into massive amounts of debt, and fight giant multinational corporations for the chance to become moderately wealthy at best? Other people will choose to become politically active in a way they have never been before in order to defend their right to drink beer. Not to mention the ever expanding amount of alternatives practically thrown our way. So why has beer persevered in the face of these challenges?

For the first nine millennia of beer’s existence there were few reasons not to love beer, it was safe, nutritious and high in much needed calories. Even though safe alternatives in coffee and tea have been available for centuries they were much too expensive and lacked the caloric value to appeal to the general populace.  In an ironic turn it should have been Louis Pasteur’s groundbreaking work Studies on Fermentation, the diseases of Beer in 1876 that sounded the death knell for beer. Although Pasteur’s work greatly improved our understanding of the brewing process it also ended beer’s reign as a staple beverage by showing that water could be made safe simply by boiling it. In Europe, beer was safe due to the cultural memory and importance of it to nations like Germany, the Netherlands, and Britain. In the fledgling United States this development came at just the wrong time; providing prohibitionists with the safe, alternatives they needed to gain ground in the fight against alcohol.

The German-Americans that controlled the majority of the American brewing industry had fought time and time again to show that beer was not a destructive substance. American beer flourished right up to the dawn of Prohibition in spite of many attacks. During the 13 year mistake that was American Prohibition the brewing industry went into rapid decline for obvious reasons. Also, during that era new alternatives to beer popped up in the soft drink industry, and Americans learned to drink liquor because it was much more profitable to smuggle in. When Prohibition came to a close the brewing industry would enter a whole new world where dieting, bland processed food, and sweet soft drinks would come into the mainstream. In order to survive this new reality breweries were forced to move towards light, dry, bland beer, welcome the American adjunct lager and its poster child Miller High Life. In the 40 years that followed Prohibition there seems to have been an all-out attack on the American palette.

Since beer was now a luxury good and no longer a necessary part of the human diet, large breweries could no longer rely on making a quality product with knowledge that everyone drinks beer. For centuries breweries prided themselves on making the best product they could to gain their market share. With so many alternatives and fewer beer drinkers than ever before, especially in the United States, new strategies would have to be devised. This strategy would involve going toe to toe with the liquor industry to be the product that got us drunk, think; “more flavor, less filling” and you will get the idea. Slowly but surely diet beers and other gimmicks began to hit store shelves and bar coolers. Fortunately, some young adults in the 1960’s and 1970’s began to reject the corporate culture of their parents’ generation including their beer.

How did the efforts of a few counter-culture entrepreneurs change American tastes again? What came to be known as the Craft Beer Movement started out very humbly with a few passionate enthusiasts preaching the good word. Now that craft brewing can really be considered to be in full swing, I would like to explore the motivations behind the passion sweeping many of us into it. Good history for me has never been a list of facts, but discovering the context in which they exist. This is why I am not going to list out a year by history of the craft beer movement up till this moment, but provide you with the context of the condition the beer world was in that dawn of the movement. Over the next months to a year I hope to have this discussion and explore what connects each of us to our favorite beverage and find out why we all learn to love beer.

For example, I am pretty sure my love affair with beer began at an early age. I grew up on the small dairy farm in northern Wisconsin that my family has farmed for over a century now. When I was young we lived in a trailer across the yard from my grandparents’ house so my Dad did not have to add a commute to his 16 hour days on the farm.  My Dad has run the farm with my Grandpa since he was in his teens, which meant Grandpa was always around.  Before my grandparents moved up to the lake to retire, which meant they stopped working Sundays, they had a bar in the basement with a kegerator. Like any boy of seven or eight I followed my grandpa everywhere. This included what he called Miller time, ironically since he was never a fan of Miller. As a family of German descent beer was never taboo in our house, although my Dad never drank, something about not enough time in the day.

On tap in the basement bar was always G. Heileman’s Old Style, until 1991 when the brewery went Bankrupt and Grandpa claimed it never tasted the same. He was pretty sure they stopped krausening it so he switched to Pabst instead, which was incidentally owned by Stroh brewing as well. As a child the part I loved was pouring the beer into the little pilsner glass he had with lunch.  This experience stuck with me as I went to college and decided to bar-tend to fund my education. Being a long-winded history major, I learned that if you could tell stories people tipped you better. I read as much about beer and liquor history as I could. The more I read, the more I appreciated and I began to dabble in craft beers. I dabbled mostly in gateway beers like Lienenkugel’s, Sam Adams, and yes occasionally even an Old Style. Now 13 years later my obsession has progressed to the point that almost every Saturday I give the tours at Lift Bridge Brewing Company. The more I thought about my own story, the more I was curious to find out what other people’s beer love stories. That is why I would like to build a cultural history of the craft beer movement to find out why, in spite of the odds, so many of us love craft beer.

Why do you love beer? Share your story below.

Brewing Comes Full Circle on the North Shore

As most of Minnesota’s craft breweries are packing up for a weekend on the north shore at Duluth’s All Pints North beer festival there is no better time for a quick primer on the region’s beer history.  Currently Duluth and Superior have a rapidly evolving beer scene with comfortable standbys like Fitger’s and new taprooms like Bent Paddle.  Although Duluth and Superior were some of the earliest explored regions in Minnesota and Wisconsin they would not incorporate as cities until the 1850’s.  In the 1800’s there was one key business necessary to the survival of any new city, a brewery.  Duluth as the younger and larger sibling would dominate brewing over the last 156 years.

The north shore has been brewing since 1857 when Sidney Luce allowed a brewery to be built on his property in an attempt to reinvigorate Duluth’s floundering economy.  That first brewery would go through many name changes between 1857 and 1972 but through most of its history it would be known as the Fitger Brewing Company.  Fitger would be joined two other large breweries and the first legitimate competition would come from Duluth Brewing and Malting in 1896, one of very few breweries to do its own malting on site.  The other brewery to open and survive in Duluth was the People’s Brewing Co founded in 1907 by eastern European immigrants with Socialist ideals as the name implies.

Duluth Brewing and Malting Company Duluth Minnesota
Inside the old Duluth Brewing and Malting Company, Duluth, Minnesota
Northeast Minnesota Historical Center – 1961

 All three breweries would survive Andrew Volstead’s attempt to doom America’s brewing industry by establishing Prohibition and in 1933 would among the first to brew beer on April 7th.  The three would survive using different methods though all would produce some form of soft drink.  After Prohibition they would each expand during the brewery boom that followed the repeal and in the 1950’s Duluth would be the only city in Minnesota to claim three breweries.  This was the high point for Duluth brewing in the 20th century but similar the rest of the nation the price wars underway by the national giants like Miller and Busch would doom each brewery in its turn.

 People’s Brewing Co was the first victim of the price wars when it shut its doors in 1957.  Duluth Brewing and Malting would soon follow suit in 1966 when the I-35 expansion needed the property.  Fitger would make it until 1972 when it finally shut its doors after a series of pitfalls surround the I-35 expansion as well.  The Minnesota Historical Society would eventually save much of the complex from demolition. Duluth would be without a brewery for 22 years until the craft beer movement finally reached Minnesota.

In 1994 Bob Dromeshauser started a small home brew shop and brewery called the Lake Superior Brewing Company in the old Fitger complex.  In 1995 the Fitger name would be revived with Fitger’s Brewhouse by Tim Nelson and Rod Raymond who have vacationed in Colorado wanted that same craft beer scene for Duluth.   Fitger’s would become one of the most popular attractions in present day Duluth.  In 1996 Twin Ports brewing would open in Superior and would eventually change hands in 2006 to become Thirsty Pagan.  A little over an hour to the east in Ashland the South Shore Brewery was founded in 1994.

The generation of brewing founded in the 90’s would joined most recently in 2011 with Castle Danger, Dubrue, Borealis Fermentary, Canal Park in 2012, and Bent Paddle in 2013.  Carmody Irish pub also added a 2 ½ barrel brew house in 2011 to join the fray.  So finally a city with a great brewing history has come full circle.  Anyone headed to the north shore this weekend for the 2nd annual All Pints North beer festival featuring 47 breweries or this summer for a great staycation I hope this helps provide you with some context for the great beer you enjoy.

Reconnect With a Beer!

Every morning we wake up, watch, listen to, or read the news only to find that the discourse in our country has devolved into something that most of us can no longer stomach.  We cannot seem to have a debate without most of it revolving around assigning blame.  How does a nation designed and built for civil discourse arrive at this place?  What does this have to do with beer and alcoholic beverages in general or the lack there of?   The United States was built in bars, taverns and breweries.  It was alcohol (mostly beer) that relaxed the thinkers of the Enlightenment enough to spur the creativity and courage to invent the concept of liberty.  The founders of this nation took that concept to a new and dangerous level.

The idea of liberty was conceived in the coffee houses and salons of Europe in the 17th and 18th centuries.  Locke, Rousseau, Montesquieu, and Voltaire were not just drinking coffee, tea, and water as they penned the discourses that would usher us into the modern world.  The convivial, collaborative atmospheres that they wrote in were fueled in most cases by beer and wine.  Since these ideas were not popular with the monarchical governments of the era alcohol provided no small amount of liquid courage as well.  The philosophical heirs to this tradition, Ben Franklin and Joseph Priestly, spent their evenings in London coffee houses exploring the practical impacts of a society based on personal freedom while imbibing porter-Franklin’s ale of choice.  Franklin also had many people of similar mind in his native land of Britain’s American colonies.

The Americans who would eventually found our nation gathered in their local taverns and over a few local ales eventually let their rebellious ideas fly.  Key among them was Samuel Adams, a maltster by trade, who was known to buy rounds of drinks to encourage people to talk.  In many ways social drinking allow the United States to come into being.  So then, how did we get from a nation founded on convivial, social drinking to one where drinking and politics become far less social?  That change mostly occurred during an era referred to as Prohibition.

Since the Volstead Act of 1919 prohibited the sale, manufacture, and transportation of alcohol Americans were forced into their homes if they wanted a drink.  After Prohibition ended people continued this tradition of drinking in their homes and the remaining breweries were eager to comply.  In the second half of the 20th century American breweries would continue to drive their product towards home consumption.  Beer became a product to be consumed at home in front of the television, not among friends and neighbors.

With the rise of the interstate system beer could be easily transported across the country allowing the large brewers to become giants and these giants only cared about profits not community.  The interstate system also helped spur the move out of cities into suburbia.  Suburbs became increasingly spread out forcing Americans to drive to get groceries, beer, or even go to a tavern if that suburb had one.  Americans learned slowly but surely that beer and cars were not a great mix so we had one more reason to drink at home.  We have become more and more personally disconnected, no longer do most of us live in close knit communities.  Instead of walking down to the local tavern to have a beer (or five) with our neighbors over a few hours we exchange 140 character notes.  I for one have difficult elaborating on an idea in 140 characters.

Beer is unique among alcoholic beverages because a person can have a few and become more social without becoming drunk. That second drink seems to relax people just enough to let their guard down for an honest, even open-minded discussion.   It seems to be more difficult to find a place where a person can have a beer or two and find themselves becoming friends with the stranger on the barstool next to them, who may only live blocks away.  Though recently something momentous has occurred locally in Minnesota.  We have rediscovered the neighborhood bar, especially the taproom.

With the 4th of July rapidly approaching we should remember the sense of community that our founders used to make this nation great.  The people who founded our country bravely drank a few beers and risked their lives to give us a place where freedom of thought and debate was encouraged.  This 4th of July shut off your electronics and walk to your local taproom, tavern, or at least walk down the street and invite your neighbor over for a beer.  Isn’t it time we disconnected our toys and reconnected face to face with a couple of beers so the conversation can become civil again?

Unintended Consequences: The Maine Law and Lager

As the Minnesota legislature contemplates a massive tax increase on brewers and distillers we may be reminded of a time in the 1920’s when state and federal governments decided to punish beer drinkers for the supposed good of everyone. The Prohibition era of the 20th century was not the first instance of this in American or Minnesota history. To find the true roots of this misguided movement we must travel back to Portland, Maine in the 1840’s. It was in this city that temperance and prohibition took their first breaths.

In 1827 Neal Dow became a founding member of the Maine Temperance Society. Most temperance advocates tried to convince people of the danger of drink but Dow believed that the only way to eliminate alcohol was by legislation. He used his influence to attempt prohibition in Maine several times before being elected mayor of Portland in April 1851. In that same year he succeeded in shepherding the first prohibition law in the nation through Maine’s legislature. With the “Maine” law in effect it would spread like a virus through the northern states. Minnesota would pass its own version of the Maine law in 1852.

Early prohibition would meet its nemesis in the German beer cultures of Milwaukee and St. Louis. German immigrants and their descendants viewed prohibition as an attack on the very lifeblood of their culture. Unlike the Northeastern Yankees, who drank heavier British style ales or rum, Germans preferred the lager beer of their homeland. Lager was considerably lighter and lower in alcohol than ale and many Germans enjoyed it in community beer gardens or other social events. As Midwesterners this should not be an altogether unfamiliar situation for most of us. In that culture beer was not viewed as an intoxicant but an everyday beverage to relax, enjoy, and be sociable.

The reaction in Milwaukee and St. Louis to prohibition should not have come as a great surprise to the temperance advocates in those states. The vehemence in the rejection of temperance came in the form of riots and mass protests at state capitols. A prohibition act did reach the Governor’s desk in Wisconsin in 1853 but was promptly vetoed. In St. Louis there was another idea entirely. There German-Americans would go to court to prove that lager beer was not an intoxicating beverage. In one story, a portly German man volunteered his time to sit in front of jurors and consume 22 beers to prove that he could not become drunk from beer.

While the Maine laws stalled in Wisconsin and Missouri they came under attack in the state where they were born. On June 2, 1855 Portland residents rioted after hearing a rumor the Neal Dow himself had sold alcohol for medicinal purposes to the state. When the rioter reached his steps he ordered the state militia to fire killing one and injuring several. This incident was repeated across other dry states. In 1856 Maine repealed Prohibition which led to repeal in several other states as crusaders focused on a different cause, abolition.

This first attempt at Prohibition taught American several lessons one being that denying people a popular product caused more problems than it solved. Minnesota would change its law because it had not counted on the reduced revenue from the lack of liquor and beer taxes. An unintended consequence of Maine laws was the popularity of lager beer. The publicity from the protests by German-Americans would lead many to try this new lager beer. Since then lager beer has become the most popular style of beer in America for more than 150 years. So go out and find a locally brewed lager or pilsner and salute our ancestors for holding off Prohibition for 80 years by teaching America how to drink beer again.

The Minnesotan Who Gave Us Prohibition

Andrew Volstead
Andrew Volstead

All around terrible guy

In these days of massive budget deficits it would sound pretty strange if a politician authored a bill that would cost the Federal government $150,000,000 in beer excise revenue and tens of thousands of jobs. That number is especially shocking when you consider that the average price of a six pack was 40 cents. These severe consequences would not deter one congressman from Minnesota’s 7 th district and that man’s name was Andrew Volstead. Volstead is best remembered for the bill bearing his name that prohibited the manufacture, sale, transport, import, or export of alcoholic beverages. Known as the Volstead Act; it began some of the darkest thirteen years in American history known as Prohibition. The problem is that while this act bears his name; Volstead himself was likely little more than a figurehead. So what do we really know about Andrew Volstead?

Andrew Volstead was born to first generation Norwegian immigrants on October 31 st 1860 near Kenyon, Minnesota. Educated as lawyer in Decorah, Iowa, Volstead and his family moved to Granite Falls in 1886 where he served as city attorney and later mayor until 1902. In 1902 he was elected to congress in Minnesota’s 7th district as member of the Republican Party. While serving in public office Volstead became increasing involved in the civil rights movement and was one of few politicians willing to argue for legislation banning lynching. During the Progressive Era civil rights would become increasingly entangled with the temperance movement. The temperance movement was backed by very vocal groups, though in the minority, the Woman’s Christian Temperance League and the Anti-Saloon League.

The Anti-Saloon League, headed by Wayne Wheeler, used bullying tactics to apply pressure on politicians to support prohibitionist measures. Aided by World War I Wheeler began a campaign to align the big brewers with the German enemy since most were of German decent; Schlitz, Pabst, Busch, and Miller. In 1919 Wheeler saw his moment and wrote a piece of legislation authorizing national Prohibition. Though Volstead never admitted it, he was likely not the main author of Prohibition. As the chair of the judiciary committee it fell to him to sponsor the bill before congress. This action would cost him his seat in Congress in 1922 as it was largely unpopular with a majority of Americans who considered it violation of their constitutional rights.

Prohibition was repealed 80 years ago this Sunday and signed into law by President Roosevelt. At 12:31 AM on April 8th, 1933 the White House received cases of beer from many of the countries remaining breweries. Though Prohibition has been over for 80 years the country is still feeling the effects of the poorly named Nobel Experiment. So while Andrew Volstead may receive more of the blame than he is due, Minnesotans can still thank him for 3.2 beer, dry Sundays, and restrictive brewing laws. This Sunday we should all raise a glass of beer, well at least those of us who planned ahead, and have a drink to celebrate the end of the Volstead Act.